Novelty in Energy Work

I didn’t do the Aeon round today, but did yesterday. Instead of saying the mantra I just prayed. Dear God And Everyone Else Who Can Help – this is my new introduction, I crack myself up — please help increase, intensify, expand and clarify my understanding and integration with ____, help us to improve our communion and communication, to evolve in the best ways together. Amen. I found when I did this that I got varying degrees of body-rush (warm fuzzies through me) with each of the Aeons.

This got me thinking. Normally when I do the round, if I am doing the mantra, I will usually either not have reaction on any of them, or have just a little on one or two, here or there in my body.

I have sometimes wondered about this. Am I just more open to merging with energy X at moment Y, than energy Q? Is it something about the mantra? If the mantra were different, would my effects with that Aeon or another be different? Is it something about the energies invoked by my living that day?

Does it matter what sequence I do them in? I have noticed that the first time I do any given mantra I seem to have a decent amount of merge-effect with all of them I do it with. (The first time I invented the mantra for the rosary-like round, the rushing was tremendous. Seemed like a good sign.)  I know, I over-think everything, but I find it all interesting.

I suddenly noticed an analogy. In remote viewing, when you are ‘cueing yourself’ for more information, one is far more likely to get it, or get a decent amount of it, on the first cue of that particular thing. “Tell me about the target,” for example, or “What is most important here?”, those are fine for cues, but they are most-fine the first-time used; they are less-inspiring when you say them to yourself a second time; usually by the third time you are lucky to get anything ‘sparked’ from it at all. Maybe later in a different context, but not just then. You want to “change it up.”

This is one of the discoveries I had about ‘chakra RV’. I came up with that after wondering if maybe certain types of data, and/or the way certain data comes through, might be affected by a focus “through” different chakras. Would visual information come better through the ajna (third-eye or forehead chakra)? Would data of any kind simply ‘be’ more visual through that chakra, might that help with interpreting it?

I experimented with this. I’d use one cue — the same one — for the RV data but I would focus “through” each chakra in turn with that cue, to see what came of it. Well, I never was able to demonstrate that the chakra mattered to either the kind of data or the way it came through — this needs many people and many sessions to learn much from, and I didn’t do enough even for me — but the one thing I did learn totally by accident was that in shifting my focus “through” each different chakra, it was the equivalent of changing the cue even though the actual words of the cue were the same.

This is fairly important since ‘sparking’ data from yourself with a cue is a big deal and being able to take a few basic questions and actually get “21 novel cue-sparks” out of it with 7 chakras of focus, now that is actually useful. (The reason it matters is because th cue is part of the energy-intent and affects the data you get. You may actually want to know, specifically, ‘what is most important’ but there’s only so many ways you can phrase it and every time you change it you have changed something about that intent. So being able to use the identical cue, but get the spark-response as if it is a novel cue simply because you’ve shifted chakra-focus, is cool.)

This overall dynamic will probably be better applied by someone later, someday, who puts it to larger use. Right now it’s just a trivia I happened to notice in passing.

There is a corollary of sorts to this in dowsing, too, where merely changing one word in your cue can change the result even when it seems to still be asking the same question. The point is that for whatever reason we don’t yet fully grok, the combined energy-of-the-inquiry is like a different stimulus which has a different response. The more different, the better.

The more NOVEL the stimulus, often the more substantial the response. There is a corollary to this too in psi work, in that despite that having a sort of consistent way of going about something has value, still, changing up one’s method of going about something often has a noticeable greater/changed response.

(This has the hilarious effect of taking a whole field obsessed with saleable paint by number plans and convincing every buyer that each newest approach is definitely the best because when they changed they saw the diff. The point is really more the change, the re-grouping and re-focusing with a new attitude, in my opinion. Much like starting a new diet!)

It occurred to me that maybe this is why so much of my current IG’s work with me, the archs and more, have one or more “elements of novelty.” I have noticed that repeatedly that something was new or the first time ever. Maybe novelty actually matters to the response. Maybe it is critical for sparking energies not normally called on. I admit that the most powerful experiences I’ve had have always been quite novel to me. Well maybe that is not by accident.

This led me to considering that although I have a mantra for my Aeon round, that unless I’m feeling ridiculously uninspired, that every time I do a round I should instead come up with something, at that very moment I begin, that I feel like doing with, saying to, or praying about, that first Aeon, and do this for each one. That way, each round is actually a novelty, a new energetic approach. I mean if the difference is a ‘rare’ sense of merge vs. daily having a lot more merge with each, it does seem like over the course of six months this could make a huge difference.

It is a little like ditching the standard formula prayer (dear god/you’re cool/gimme stuff/in Jesus’s name/I’m done) and working on truly being spontaneous and inspired and free-form and making every communication genuinely from the heart and unique to that moment.

I did an archmed yesterday on “whatever I am most resistant about,” which I then modified, “I mean, which I am capable of working with,” because I suddenly had the feeling that ‘the most resistant’ thing would just fall out of my brain because I am, well, that resistant, haha. The archetype was so interesting. I was surprised I could see it at all let alone well. Then I was surprised that I found it pretty, which is rare to doesn’t-even-happen for things I am usually resistant to.

The figure was like human but instead of a head there was this fat flat post like where the neck would be and then instead of a head, that post sprouted two wide saturns-rings-like round shapes (half on each) that came around and left some open space in front. The flat open-front ring-like shape was sparkly deep-blue glitter with other sparkly glitters of metallics and deep green. I was so surprised that I found it so pretty, as I’d expected something either hard to see or yucky. [Later edit 24MAR2012: I just noticed something odd; the rich deep sparkly color of this, and my sense of beauty, reminds me greatly of my brief experience (recent) seeing the Heart Chakra. I don’t suppose this could have been a chakra or an archetype ‘influenced by’ the translated visual of one?)

Anyway, I did just the standard stuff which gradually reduced everything until it was a normal person, a man, but his head was unclear, and there was still that sense of the colors there. Then I forgot what the hell I was doing, can’t remember why, and only remembered tonight and went back and just finished with an energy-trade. “Sorry,” I told IG.

But when I was finished I thought: would that meditation have gone better from the beginning if I had NOT done the standard things in the standard sequence? If I tried to find something ‘novel’ to do as my cleaning/healing format with every archetype? Would it work better or more powerfully? Would we get more merge result from the work? What role does novelty have in how I work with archetypes?

If novelty in how I interact matters with a remote viewing target, with one of my Aeons in prayer, with an archetype — what else might it matter to?

P