Consciously I want to evolve.
My ego resists and I forget.
I blog, re-read, remember.
So I blog for me, mostly.
I have found that:
- → sincere and regular prayer
- → genuinely good intentions
- → present-focus, "interest"
- → extended sense of humor
- → honesty, sharing, healing
- → constant work to discover and release bias in oneself
- →
dogged (to the extreme) effort to pursue awareness and understanding
Leads a person to "interactive insight from the inside." We only grok by going through. Spiritual growth is like all others: you absorb, become aware, and via love (sympathetic rapport and desire to become or absorb) and will (directed intent), that energy becomes part of your singular sense of identity. The 'growth' is in awareness, and with that comes power which is always over Self. Diversity is Legion; Singularity is the I AM. None of this is new or unique. It's simply "unconscious and slow" for most people. I figure I can't help doing it, so I would rather do it well than badly. Darkness is not of the Nothingness. It is not the opposite of light, as it only exists within the realm of light itself. Darkness is just something-ness lacking color. The universe is fundamentally of light, and darkness fails to hold dominance and fails to understand why: its nature precludes it: awareness itself makes all identities children of the light.
|
Posted by Palyne on 2008.03.05 Archived from the former firedocs blog. 27 August 2005
There are pod creatures living inside me.
Rereading Swann’s work, something McMoneagle wrote suddenly dovetailed in. Those train cars locked together in my tiny little brain and gave me an idea.
This is long so skip it if you’re not in the reading mood.
Swann was talking about (my words/interp here) having physiological faculties for in some way connecting to psi info. That first those must be working. THEN we take it into the body, process it physically, translate it usually to one of the 5 sense organs we are most familiar with, then process it in accordance with memory, belief systems, etc. at which point it finally gets to the point of being an ‘impression’ that we get during a psychic session.
A helluva lot goes on prior to that ‘impression’. So he was saying that to be consistent and conscious of our remote viewing we have to get some kind of cognitive awareness of this process; of the part of ourself that makes this happen.
I was reminded of a time in 1994 when I was having “bilocational alien-type experiences.” and getting my ass kicked ‘there’ regularly. I was incredibly lucid by nature, partly as a result of spending years in very intensive self-hypnosis study. So I’d get lucid, realize what was going on, and flip out and try to escape. And they would catch me (the big blonde dudes with over-blue big slightly slanted eyes). On the
Read the full article at Psychic Pods
http://www.palyne.com/blog.psiche/psychic-pods/
Posted by Palyne on 2007.09.11 Long ago when I wrote Bewilderness, I said in the narrative something like,
I psychoanalyzed myself only until I realized I was obviously a lunatic, at which point I concluded I was just giving myself a complex and might as well stop.
I’ve been kind of in denial of viewing the last couple days even though I want to, and I keep thinking about it, and I miss it so much for not having done nearly enough of it lately. I’m carefully avoiding info on TKR’s latest mission so I can squeeze in viewing the target before I expose myself to talk about it…I missed the deadline by a mile thanks to being simultaneously in interest-but-avoidance.
I need therapy.
Meanwhile, I’ve been thinking about the whole archetype vs. session thing. You know, I’m not 100% sure I can honestly say that getting accurate surface data is more important to me than an experience I feel touches my soul and amazes and inspires me. Calabrese called this “process vs. product” and I think that is a decent way of putting it.
I find that the more I view, the more the process starts to mean more to me. The more that a decent data-session with a poor “experiential factor” is a disappointment, while a lousy data-session with a great “experiential factor” feels like a consolation, and usually like it was well worth the effort regardless of the product result.
I feel that this is contrary to RV as a focus.
Read the full article at Self-Judging Sanity
http://www.palyne.com/blog.psiche/self-judging-sanity/
Posted by Palyne on 2007.08.19 Yeah… I know. It has been far too long since I’ve blogged anything anywhere. Especially at this one, which is too weird for even the weirdos I know. If you’re reading this and ever wondered about yourself, now is the time to worry.
It’s one of those things where, had I been blogging, I would have had probably 50 things I could have blogged about, but now somehow I have none. Because it would be like making a big deal of just little things.
So as a way of kind of getting back into occasional blogging again, I thought I would just clean out the recent file drawer so to speak. Which is not all that exciting. But I notice when I go back and read my blogs that what happens on day 10 is often related to what came before, for example. So whatever happened the last week or less is probably going to have some effect on what happens this and next week. So I might as well get it down on virtual paper.
*0*
Alrighty then. First on the front: Archetype meditations for remote viewing.
Now the most interesting thing about this lately is my realization yesterday, when I went back and read this blog’s few entries, that I had completely forgotten just about everything. I mean literally forgotten. Like all the previous experiences on this blog including my 3-stage approach to using archs in viewing, simply never existed.
I noticed about a dozen years ago,
Posted by Palyne on 2007.05.05 My archmeds for remote viewing have expanded in depth but contracted in time and effort. I have begun to skip the majority of the archmed process altogether. I simply imagine myself in ‘my space’ which is just for archetypes of targets, I imagine Inner Guide (IG) introducing me to a human-form archetype which is the summation of energy of the target, I am nice to it for a moment, and then we allow IG to “weave us together.” Then in this merged state I begin the session. It doesn’t make more than about 30 seconds to get there.
When the session is done, I keep the target merged with me to review feedback, write out my notes, etc. Then I tell IG we are ready to be “unwoven” from each other. I take a few breaths as I imagine this and feel the shift in my awareness. Then I do a brief reality med (impossible to describe in so short a space) to heal, strengthen, and sometimes mutate, aspects of myself that might have some trouble with the process I just experienced.
If I don’t set a time limit on this process, I refer to it as protocol ArchNT, for “Remote Viewing, planned session, optional precognitive to target generation, worked soloblind, archetype-RV methodology, no time limit (nt).”
o0o
In my mental model, I AM the target, and it is ‘of me’. Here’s a model you might recognize. If you are colorblind you should see ’70′ in this pic. If
|
Reality = Physiology = Psychology = Spirituality = Cosmology = Geometry = Number = Sound = Form There is no difference.  Posts  Comments Identity is an arbitrary collection of consciousness assigned a title. My work is not just study; it's prayer, it's mental techniques, it's life habits. It's not just about inner worlds; discipline and physical environment matter. It's not just spiritual; my body and world is part of it. It's not just esoteric; everything corresponds integrally — the mundane, the arcane, the divine. It's not just an '-ology'; my own identity, body, reality, psyche is key to it all. The only tenets of truth I hold are based on personal experience.This effort has spanned my life, but not until ~1994 did it become intentional, not 'til late '00s did it become fairly 'serious'. I've gone through many models and philosophies over time, but now I've none except what experience teach me. I am ever the student, but I've reached a point of "fluency" and "internal guidance" where I don't care about labels or other peoples' paradigms.
CATEGORIES on this blog are extensive and nested. Most everything that matters or repeats much has a category.
The TAGS are just minor notes of reference trivia. They are usually a rare experience, or an observation about something I read.
|
Recent Comments